An exploration of a modern 2024 phenomenon of “terrorism”. Investigating the origins/etymology of the word “terrorism” I discover that it comes from: “1795, in reference to Jacobins during the French Revolution, from French terroriste; see terror + -ist, and compare terrorism. Originally of state intimidation and government coercion by methods of terror” (Source etymology online)
Now, in 2024 that definition has totally been turned around to mean in Australia, “A terrorist act is an act, or a threat to commit an act, that is done with the intention to coerce. or influence the public or any government by intimidation to advance a political, religious or. ideological cause, and the act causes: • death or serious harm or endangers life.” (Source, livinggsafetogether.gov.au)
What if we are to apply the original definition to governments of today, no specific fingers pointed.
The term “terrorism” has evolved significantly since its origins in the French Revolution. While it was initially used to describe state-sponsored intimidation, its modern usage often refers to acts of violence perpetrated by non-state actors with the intent to intimidate or coerce a population or government.
Examples of modern-day state intimidation and government coercion, while not always explicitly labeled as “terrorism,” can include:
Surveillance and Mass Surveillance: Governments may use extensive surveillance programs to monitor citizens’ activities, potentially leading to intimidation and a sense of being constantly watched. Examples. CCTV, licence plate detection, mobile phone detection, speed cameras, Central Bank Digital Currency, Digital ID, Voice sign in, fingerprint sign in, facial recognition, PayWave, RFID,
Censorship and Restrictions on Free Speech: Governments may impose strict censorship laws or limits on free speech to suppress dissent and control public discourse. The Australian government misinformation and disinformation bill.
Intimidation of Political Opponents: Governments may use tactics such as harassment, threats, or imprisonment to silence political opponents or suppress opposition movements. The Australian government misinformation and disinformation bill.
Use of Force Against Protests: Governments may deploy excessive force against peaceful protests, leading to intimidation and a chilling effect on dissent. We have seen plenty of this in the state of Victoria, Australia as well as in Canada.
Economic Coercion: Governments may use economic sanctions or trade restrictions to pressure other countries or individuals into compliance, potentially leading to hardship and intimidation. Examples TAX, Fines, prison, people being debanked in many countries. Economic sanctions against Russia.
When we apply the strict definition, then surely the governments are the ones ruling by fear and intimidation.
The use of force or coercion by governments is a sensitive issue with varying interpretations and ethical considerations.
Terrorism typically involves violence or threats of violence intended to achieve political goals. So ask yourself today, is my government terrorising its people?
The Tale of the Dragon and the Butterfly
In a land under a dragon’s reign, Peace once flowed like a gentle stream. Wisdom and compassion graced its rule, Yet time’s embrace hardened scales with fear.
Walls rose high, rivers were dammed, The land’s vibrant heart grew dim. Eyes that once offered gentle watch, Now pierced through the lives of its people.
From a hidden garden, a butterfly emerged, Wings aglow with hope and freedom’s hues. It danced unaware of the darkened skies, Of the fear that clouded the land below.
Seeing shadows cast upon the joy, The butterfly fluttered toward the walls, Its delicate wings brushing against stone, Defying the dragon’s fiery wrath.
The dragon’s fire met with light, The butterfly’s wings shimmered bright. Its courage stirred the hearts of many, Questioning the dragon’s fearful might.
And so, the dragon withdrew in dread, Its roar now a whisper in the night. The butterfly’s flight, a spark of change, Proved even the small could challenge the dark.
Many people are not ready to hear this. Recently I was asked: “Are you good”
I replied, “No! I am well and good does not exist,” the look of shock from my interlocutor then prompted me to follow up with, “good and evil are only subjective concepts and don’t really exist except in people’s minds”
I have been exploring “Beyond Good and Evil” by Friedrich Nietzsche so I thought that I would share some of the major insights of the book. I’ll begin with a summary of the book and then explore some of the concepts and finish it off with a bit of poetry about the reevaluation of values that Nietzsche writes about.
Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche explores several key philosophical concepts that challenge conventional morality and truth. Here are the main ideas:
Critique of Traditional Morality
Nietzsche critiques the moral systems of his time, particularly Christian and Kantian morality, which he views as based on weakness and self-denial. He introduces the concept of master-slave morality:
a.)Master morality: Values power, strength, and nobility. It creates its own values based on self-assertion and confidence.
b.) Slave morality: Based on values like humility, kindness, and sympathy, it arises from the resentment of the oppressed toward the powerful.
Will to Power
Nietzsche proposes that all living things are driven by a fundamental force he calls the will to power—the desire to assert control, grow, and overcome challenges. This is not just about political power but includes creativity, personal growth, and self-overcoming.
Revaluation of Values
Nietzsche argues for a revaluation of all values, urging people to move beyond traditional moral dichotomies of good and evil. He promotes the idea of creating new values that celebrate life, strength, and individualism.
The Overman (Übermensch)
Although discussed more in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the concept of the Overman is hinted at in Beyond Good and Evil. The Overman is an individual who transcends conventional morality and creates their own values, living authentically and fully.
Critique of Truth and Philosophy
Nietzsche questions the notion of objective truth, especially in traditional philosophy. He argues that truth is often a construct shaped by human needs and desires. Philosophers, Nietzsche claims, are often driven by subconscious motives rather than a pure search for truth.
Perspectivism
Nietzsche develops the idea of perspectivism, which holds that knowledge and truth are always influenced by the individual’s perspective and biases. There is no absolute, objective truth, only different perspectives on reality.
Eternal Recurrence
The idea of eternal recurrence—the notion that life repeats itself infinitely—is not central to Beyond Good and Evil but is a recurring theme in Nietzsche’s work. It challenges readers to live life as if every action would be repeated eternally.
Noble Spirit
Nietzsche speaks of the noble spirit, an individual who rises above herd mentality, embraces life’s struggles, and creates new values. This type of person embraces solitude and the challenges of self-creation rather than conforming to societal norms.
These themes together form Nietzsche’s critique of Western thought and his call for a more dynamic and life-affirming philosophy. Next, I drill down and explore “perspectivism” in order to comprehend it better.
Perspectivism is one of Friedrich Nietzsche’s core philosophical ideas, and it challenges traditional notions of objective truth. Here are the main ideas behind perspectivism:
No Objective Truth
Nietzsche argues that there is no single, universal truth that is independent of perspective. Instead, what we consider “truth” is shaped by our experiences, culture, and personal biases. Knowledge and truth are always seen from a specific point of view.
Knowledge is Interpretive
According to perspectivism, all knowledge is an interpretation, not a direct representation of reality. Different individuals, cultures, or groups interpret reality differently, and these interpretations are influenced by historical, psychological, and social factors.
Multiple Perspectives Enrich Understanding
While Nietzsche rejects the notion of absolute truth, he doesn’t advocate for pure relativism. He suggests that by considering multiple perspectives, we can arrive at a richer and more nuanced understanding of reality. No single perspective can capture the whole truth, but each provides valuable insights.
Critique of Philosophers and Scientists
Nietzsche criticises philosophers and scientists for believing that their views represent absolute, objective truth. He believes that their “truths” are often products of their own personal perspectives, desires, and will to power.
Will to Power as a Shaping Force
Perspectivism is closely tied to Nietzsche’s concept of the will to power. He argues that perspectives are shaped by the will to power—the fundamental drive for growth, dominance, and self-assertion. Different individuals and cultures adopt perspectives that affirm their sense of strength and power.
Perspectivism vs. Relativism
Nietzsche distinguishes perspectivism from complete relativism. Perspectivism doesn’t suggest that all perspectives are equally valid, but rather that each perspective offers a partial and limited view of reality. Some perspectives may be more life-affirming, creative, or empowering than others.
Artistic and Creative Approach to Truth
Perspectivism opens the door for individuals to approach life and truth more creatively. Instead of being bound by rigid, fixed truths, people can create their own perspectives, shaping their understanding of the world in ways that enhance their lives.
In essence, perspectivism challenges the idea that any one person, philosophy, or system can claim to have access to an ultimate, objective truth. Instead, Nietzsche encourages a recognition of the subjective nature of all knowledge and the power of interpretation.
Nietzsche’s critique of truth and philosophy is one of his most profound contributions to modern thought, radically challenging traditional Western notions of objective truth, reason, and the role of philosophy. Here are the key aspects of this critique:
Truth as a Human Construct
Nietzsche rejects the idea that truth exists as something absolute or objective, independent of human interpretation. He sees truth as a human creation, formed by our psychological, cultural, and historical contexts. Truth is not discovered but invented to serve certain purposes, often shaped by the needs and desires of individuals or societies.
Nietzsche calls the traditional notion of truth a metaphysical illusion, arguing that human beings invent concepts, categories, and distinctions (such as “good” and “evil”) to make sense of a chaotic and indifferent world. Over time, we forget that these concepts are inventions, and they become reified as “truth.”
The Will to Truth vs. The Will to Power
Nietzsche challenges the value placed on truth itself, suggesting that the will to truth—the desire to uncover and cling to an ultimate truth—is often a disguise for deeper drives, especially the will to power. He argues that philosophers have traditionally sought truth not out of a genuine love of knowledge, but because it provides a sense of control, stability, and power over life’s uncertainties.
For Nietzsche, the will to power is a more fundamental force than the will to truth. Philosophers, scientists, and moralists often elevate “truth” as a tool to impose order, justify their beliefs, or maintain their dominance in society.
Truth as a Lie
Nietzsche famously refers to truth as “a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms.” He suggests that what we call “truth” is simply a collection of metaphors and linguistic constructs that have become codified over time. These metaphors, originally created for practical purposes, are eventually mistaken for the actual nature of reality. In this sense, all “truths” are merely useful lies that help humans navigate the world.
Nietzsche sees language as one of the main ways through which these fictions are created and sustained. Philosophers, by claiming access to universal truths, are complicit in perpetuating these illusions.
Critique of Philosophers
Nietzsche critiques the dogmatism of philosophers, accusing them of being deeply unaware of the motives behind their search for truth. He argues that philosophers have historically claimed to pursue objective truth, but they are often driven by subconscious desires, moral prejudices, or religious biases. He accuses them of pretending to be disinterested seekers of truth when, in reality, they are influenced by hidden motivations like the need for security, morality, or self-justification.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche writes, “Every great philosophy is… the personal confession of its author and a kind of involuntary and unperceived memoir.” He sees philosophical systems not as reflections of objective reality, but as expressions of the philosopher’s individual perspective and life experience.
Attack on Socratic Rationalism
Nietzsche is particularly critical of Socratic rationalism and its legacy in Western thought. He blames Socrates and Plato for introducing the idea that reason and logic are the highest human faculties, capable of accessing eternal truths. Nietzsche sees this emphasis on reason as a rejection of life’s more chaotic, irrational, and instinctual aspects, which are essential to human vitality.
He accuses Socrates of representing a decadent life-denying philosophy that elevates reason at the expense of instinct and emotion. Nietzsche believes that this rationalism contributes to the suppression of human creativity and vitality, as it prioritises abstract truth over lived experience.
Critique of Metaphysics
Nietzsche’s critique extends to metaphysical systems, especially those like Platonism and Christianity that posit a dualism between the material world and a higher realm of transcendent truth (e.g., the world of Forms or Heaven). Nietzsche calls this metaphysical split a form of life-denial, arguing that it devalues the real, sensual world in favour of an imagined, otherworldly reality.
This dualistic thinking, Nietzsche argues, is rooted in ressentiment—the resentment of life by those who are weak or suffering. By creating a “true” world beyond this one, metaphysical systems encourage a rejection of life’s imperfections and struggles, which Nietzsche believes should be embraced rather than escaped.
Perspectivism and Truth
Nietzsche introduces perspectivism as an alternative to traditional notions of truth. Perspectivism holds that all knowledge is seen from a particular perspective, shaped by individual and cultural biases. There is no single, objective vantage point from which we can apprehend reality in its totality. Instead, truth is always relative to the perspective of the observer.
While Nietzsche does not deny the existence of reality, he denies the possibility of fully capturing it in a neutral, objective way. Every “truth” is an interpretation, and the more perspectives we take into account, the richer our understanding becomes.
Noble Lie and the Value of Illusions
Despite his critique of truth, Nietzsche does not dismiss the value of illusions and lies entirely. He acknowledges that certain “noble lies”—myths, artistic visions, and personal fictions—can play a crucial role in human flourishing. These illusions can create meaning, inspire creativity, and give individuals the strength to overcome life’s hardships.
Nietzsche’s critique is not aimed at eliminating illusions altogether, but at exposing those illusions that masquerade as absolute truths and enslave the human spirit. He calls for a more creative, life-affirming use of illusions, where individuals take responsibility for crafting their own truths.
Truth as Dynamic, Not Static
Nietzsche also emphasises that truth should be understood as dynamic and evolving, rather than as something fixed and eternal. He challenges the view that truth is a static set of propositions waiting to be discovered. Instead, truth is something that is constantly created and re-created through human experience, interpretation, and action.
This idea ties into Nietzsche’s concept of self-overcoming, where individuals and societies must continually challenge and surpass their current understanding of truth, rather than becoming complacent in fixed dogmas.
In Nietzsche’s critique, truth is not an objective, eternal reality waiting to be discovered, but rather a product of human invention and interpretation. He critiques the tradition of Western philosophy for pretending to offer absolute truths, which are often expressions of hidden motives or will to power. Nietzsche calls for a revaluation of truth, encouraging a more creative, dynamic, and life-affirming approach to knowledge that embraces multiple perspectives and the complexities of human experience.
Nietzsche’s critique of truth and philosophy is one of his most profound contributions to modern thought, radically challenging traditional Western notions of objective truth, reason, and the role of philosophy. Here are the key aspects of this critique:
Truth as a Human Construct
Nietzsche rejects the idea that truth exists as something absolute or objective, independent of human interpretation. He sees truth as a human creation, formed by our psychological, cultural, and historical contexts. Truth is not discovered but invented to serve certain purposes, often shaped by the needs and desires of individuals or societies.
Nietzsche calls the traditional notion of truth a metaphysical illusion, arguing that human beings invent concepts, categories, and distinctions (such as “good” and “evil”) to make sense of a chaotic and indifferent world. Over time, we forget that these concepts are inventions, and they become reified as “truth.”
The Will to Truth vs. The Will to Power
Nietzsche challenges the value placed on truth itself, suggesting that the will to truth—the desire to uncover and cling to an ultimate truth—is often a disguise for deeper drives, especially the will to power. He argues that philosophers have traditionally sought truth not out of a genuine love of knowledge, but because it provides a sense of control, stability, and power over life’s uncertainties.
For Nietzsche, the will to power is a more fundamental force than the will to truth. Philosophers, scientists, and moralists often elevate “truth” as a tool to impose order, justify their beliefs, or maintain their dominance in society.
Truth as a Lie
Nietzsche famously refers to truth as “a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms.” He suggests that what we call “truth” is simply a collection of metaphors and linguistic constructs that have become codified over time. These metaphors, originally created for practical purposes, are eventually mistaken for the actual nature of reality. In this sense, all “truths” are merely useful lies that help humans navigate the world.
Nietzsche sees language as one of the main ways through which these fictions are created and sustained. Philosophers, by claiming access to universal truths, are complicit in perpetuating these illusions.
Critique of Philosophers
Nietzsche critiques the dogmatism of philosophers, accusing them of being deeply unaware of the motives behind their search for truth. He argues that philosophers have historically claimed to pursue objective truth, but they are often driven by subconscious desires, moral prejudices, or religious biases. He accuses them of pretending to be disinterested seekers of truth when, in reality, they are influenced by hidden motivations like the need for security, morality, or self-justification.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche writes, “Every great philosophy is… the personal confession of its author and a kind of involuntary and unperceived memoir.” He sees philosophical systems not as reflections of objective reality, but as expressions of the philosopher’s individual perspective and life experience.
Attack on Socratic Rationalism
Nietzsche is particularly critical of Socratic rationalism and its legacy in Western thought. He blames Socrates and Plato for introducing the idea that reason and logic are the highest human faculties, capable of accessing eternal truths. Nietzsche sees this emphasis on reason as a rejection of life’s more chaotic, irrational, and instinctual aspects, which are essential to human vitality.
Nietzsche accuses Socrates of representing a decadent life-denying philosophy that elevates reason at the expense of instinct and emotion. Nietzsche believes that this rationalism contributes to the suppression of human creativity and vitality, as it prioritises abstract truth over lived experience.
Critique of Metaphysics
Nietzsche’s critique extends to metaphysical systems, especially those like Platonism and Christianity that posit a dualism between the material world and a higher realm of transcendent truth (e.g., the world of Forms or Heaven). Nietzsche calls this metaphysical split a form of life-denial, arguing that it devalues the real, sensual world in favour of an imagined, otherworldly reality.
This dualistic thinking, Nietzsche argues, is rooted in ressentiment—the resentment of life by those who are weak or suffering. By creating a “true” world beyond this one, metaphysical systems encourage a rejection of life’s imperfections and struggles, which Nietzsche believes should be embraced rather than escaped.
Perspectivism and Truth
Nietzsche introduces perspectivism as an alternative to traditional notions of truth. Perspectivism holds that all knowledge is seen from a particular perspective, shaped by individual and cultural biases. There is no single, objective vantage point from which we can apprehend reality in its totality. Instead, truth is always relative to the perspective of the observer.
Nietzsche does not deny the existence of reality, however he denies the possibility of fully capturing it in a neutral, objective way. Every “truth” is an interpretation, and the more perspectives we take into account, the richer our understanding becomes.
Noble Lie and the Value of Illusions
Despite his critique of truth, Nietzsche does not dismiss the value of illusions and lies entirely. He acknowledges that certain “noble lies”—myths, artistic visions, and personal fictions—can play a crucial role in human flourishing. These illusions can create meaning, inspire creativity, and give individuals the strength to overcome life’s hardships.
Nietzsche’s critique is not aimed at eliminating illusions altogether, but at exposing those illusions that masquerade as absolute truths and enslave the human spirit. He calls for a more creative, life-affirming use of illusions, where individuals take responsibility for crafting their own truths.
Truth as Dynamic, Not Static
Nietzsche also emphasises that truth should be understood as dynamic and evolving, rather than as something fixed and eternal. He challenges the view that truth is a static set of propositions waiting to be discovered. Instead, truth is something that is constantly created and re-created through human experience, interpretation, and action.
This idea ties into Nietzsche’s concept of self-overcoming, where individuals and societies must continually challenge and surpass their current understanding of truth, rather than becoming complacent in fixed dogmas.
Summary
In Nietzsche’s critique, truth is not an objective, eternal reality waiting to be discovered, but rather a product of human invention and interpretation. He critiques the tradition of Western philosophy for pretending to offer absolute truths, which are often expressions of hidden motives or will to power. Nietzsche calls for a revaluation of truth, encouraging a more creative, dynamic, and life-affirming approach to knowledge that embraces multiple perspectives and the complexities of human experience.
A Revaluation of All That We Know : In the spirit of Nietzsche
In times long past, the masters rose, With pride, with strength, the power flows. They shaped the world with daring hand, And carved their values from the land.
Yet slaves beneath, with heads bowed low, Spoke of a virtue meek and slow. Their kindness born from hearts oppressed, Resentment veiled in holy dress.
But shall we live in chains of old? Where pity dims the hearts once bold? No! Let us rise, create anew— For life is not a thing to rue.
Let good and evil fall away, Their grip dissolves in light of day. No single truth shall bind us tight, But countless stars shall spark our night.
We are the gods within our skin, And power’s will we hold within. Through struggle’s fire, we forge our name, Not seeking comfort, nor acclaim.
The "Superman", with vision clear, Shall rise above both doubt and fear. Not chained to creed or ancient lore, But born to dream, create, explore.
The weak may curse with righteous spite, But strength and joy shall be our light. For what is life, if not a test, To face its pain and call it blessed?
Let slave morality be shed, And with it, hope of heaven’s dead. For God is gone, and in His wake, We bear the truth we dare to make.
And in the void, we do not cry, For nihil’s touch will pass us by. From nothingness, we craft our way, And fill the dark with Dionysian play.
So let us dance, create, and rise— In every fall, a new surprise. For values new we shall bestow, Upon the world, as we shall grow.
No chains of meekness shall remain, Nor pity in the face of pain. With life affirmed, in every breath, We rise to meet what lies in death.
Explore the vibrant and colourful surreal poetry and artwork of Thundercloud’s Thunderzine#01
Are you ready to embark on a journey beyond the ordinary? My latest creation, a zine brimming with surreal poetry and art, has just been released!
This unique offering is a playground for the imagination. Within its pages, you’ll encounter poems that dance with dreamlike imagery and art that bends reality in captivating ways. It’s a space to lose yourself in the beauty and absurdity of the surreal.
Calling all fans of the strange and wonderful!
Whether you’re a seasoned explorer of the surreal or just dipping your toes into the unknown, this zine is for you. It’s a chance to experience the world through a different lens, to be surprised and delighted by the unexpected. You will discover what it is like to become a flying giraffe amongst other things.
Want your own copy?
For just $5 plus postage, you can own a piece of the surreal. Contact me directly at 1english1@gmail.com to secure your copy.
Don’t miss this opportunity to delve into a world where the ordinary is defied and the extraordinary takes centre stage. Let my surreal zine ignite your imagination and transport you to a place where anything is possible.
Get your own copy of the artwork or have it shipped directly to you. Don’t miss out on this unique artistic experience! #SurrealArt #Thunderzine #ArtExhibition #AustralianPoetry #ColourfulArt #ArtCollectors #CreativeCommunity #ArtLovers #PsychedelicArt #ArtInspiration
The term “woke” has morphed from a call for awareness to a stifling dogma threatening free speech and critical thinking. While fighting for equality is undeniably important, the Wokerati’s brand of social justice has become a divisive force. Let’s dissect why:
Cancel Culture: Disagree with a celebrity’s past tweet? “Cancel” them! This intolerance stifles open discourse and drowns out dissenting voices. We can’t erase the past, but we can learn from it.
Identity Politics: Constantly judging individuals based solely on race, gender, or sexual orientation is not only reductionist, but also breeds resentment. We are all complex individuals – judging people based on group identity undermines that.
Safe Spaces: The constant push for “safe spaces” where nobody is ever offended creates a generation afraid of challenging ideas. True learning comes from open debate, not echo chambers.
Political Correctness Run Amok: Language constantly polices itself, erasing nuance and humour in the name of avoiding offence. This stifles creativity and can lead to unintended consequences.
The core message of “woke” – fighting for equality – is a noble one. But when it becomes an ideology focused on shaming and silencing, it backfires. We need to move beyond divisive labels and have open conversations. Real social progress comes from acceptance, respect, tolerance, unity, understanding, and a willingness to listen, not from performative outrage and public shaming.
Where to from Here?
Let’s reclaim the true meaning of social justice. Let’s focus on common ground and respectful dialogue. Let’s judge individuals based on their merit, actions and ideas, not their race or gender. Only then can we create a truly inclusive and tolerant society.
I have just finished reading Dr Thomas Sowell’s seminal work, “Intellectuals and Society,” in which the author posits a central thesis that challenges the undue influence of contemporary intellectuals on public discourse and policy. Sowell’s critique rests on several key premises:
1. Epistemological Hubris: Intellectuals, particularly those subscribing to specific ideological frameworks, often exhibit an inflated confidence in their knowledge and proposed solutions to societal problems. This overreliance on centralized planning and state intervention, Sowell argues, can have detrimental unforeseen consequences.
2. Empirical Neglect: He emphasizes the importance of grounding intellectual pursuits in robust empirical evidence and historical context. Criticisms are levied against intellectuals for selective data analysis, neglecting opposing viewpoints, and dismissing inconvenient realities that contradict their preferred narratives.
3. Idealistic Abstractions: The book contends that intellectuals are often drawn to utopian visions of social justice without adequately considering the complexities of real-world implementation and potentially negative downstream effects. Sowell champions a more pragmatic approach focused on achievable improvements informed by evidence and existing institutional frameworks.
4. Collectivist Biases: He criticizes the tendency of intellectuals to prioritize collective identities (race, class, gender) over individual agency, often attributing individual struggles solely to pre-existing systemic factors. Sowell advocates for a greater emphasis on personal responsibility and initiative as crucial factors in individual advancement.
While acknowledging the valuable role intellectuals can play in contributing insights and stimulating debate, Sowell ultimately calls for a more measured and evidence-based approach to intellectual discourse and policymaking. His core thesis prioritizes individual agency and pragmatic solutions over grand ideologies and simplistic diagnoses of societal issues.
However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that “Intellectuals and Society” has generated both praise and criticism. While some celebrate its critique of intellectual arrogance and its focus on historical context and individual agency, others have challenged its broad generalizations about intellectuals, its selective use of evidence, and its perceived ideological bias.
In order to wrap my head around the ides presented, I have written the following parable about an owl who gets rid of all the tree leaves so that the forest floor can receive an equal amount of sunlight.
giant old tree stump
The Parable of the Owl who thought he knew better.
Or (The double edged sword of intellectual arrogance)
In emerald halls where sunlight dared not tread,
where ancient oaks held secrets whispering low,
Hootah the Owl, with wisdom’s crown upon his head,
Preached of shadows where the forest should not grow.
His feathered form, a tapestry of speckled night,
His voice, a siren’s song in boughs of aged might,
He spoke of trees that hoarded golden rays,
And creatures veiled in gloom, denied their rightful days.
The forest stirred, a ripple of discontent,
From timid mouse to stoic, lumbering ox,
Hootah’s words, a firebrand heaven-sent,
Ignited dreams of light beyond the locks.
He promised justice etched in sunlit lines,
A grand utopia where shadows dared not creep,
With shears of justice and with boughs entwined,
He vowed to banish gloom from slumber’s deepest sleep.
The rabbits danced, their fur ablaze with hope,
The squirrels clambered, eager to enforce the decree,
But Sowell the Ox, wise with seasons’ patient scope,
Felt doubt’s first tremor touch his ancient knee.
He’d seen the scars of grand designs laid bare,
The unintended thorn that grew with borrowed light,
The parched earth gasping ‘neath a denuded lair,
Where once the shade had held the sun at bay just right.
But Hootah’s fervor drowned the whispering fear,
His pronouncements rang like gongs upon the breeze,
And doubt was swept away, a tear uncried, unnear,
As branches were chopped, a sacrifice to sunlit ease.
And for a time, the forest shimmered bright,
The undergrowth, a canvas newly spun,
But soon the cracks of error came to light,
As withered branches mocked the rising sun.
The parched earth cracked, a thirsty song,
The rabbits searched for solace in the dust,
The squirrels clung to limbs, skeletal shadows long,
Their dreams of plenty transformed to disgust.
Then Sowell, voice a rumble from the ground,
Spoke truths etched deep in roots and ancient bark,
“Hootah’s grand design, with fetters tightly bound,
Can only steal the dance of darkness and the dark
Of nature’s own design, where sun and shade conspire
To weave a tapestry where life, in balance, thrives,
No single thread, however bathed in fire,
Can mend the broken loom where every creature strives.”
His words, a balm on fevered forest dreams,
Awoke the doubt that Hootah’s vision hid,
Squirrels’ lost their grip and rabbits’ angry screams,
A barrage of questions, unanswered by the whizz-kid
Hootah, perched upon his throne of withered pride,
Saw shadows creeping back to claim their due,
His grand design, by nature’s hand defied,
His promises dissolved like morning dew.
And so the forest healed, with lessons learned at last,
That harmony, not schemes, will guide the light,
That Sowell’s wisdom, whispered on the blast,
Is nature’s truest song, sung clear and bold and bright.
This tale, a whispered echo in the leaves,
A song of shadows woven with the sun,
Reminds that grand designs, like fallen sheaves,
May wither in the soil where balance has begun.
Can you help the Australian Poetry Film Contest?
Oz on Screen: A Poetry Film Feast in Guyra
Calling all poets and film fanatics! Get ready for the 2024 Australian Poetry Film Festival, a November bash celebrating words on screen in Aussie style. Imagine outback landscapes in motion, love poems whispered by waves, and bush ballads brought to life with modern magic.
This Guyra event welcomes everyone – young, old, poets, filmmakers, all! We especially love fresh takes on our rich bush poetry tradition. Think vibrant images, powerful verses, and stories that crackle with Aussie spirit.
Plus, the festival joins forces with “Poets on the Mountain,” so expect workshops, panels, and screenings under starry skies. It’s a creative melting pot where you’ll meet passionate folks and see the future of storytelling unfold.
But to make this poetry party pop, we need your help! We’re crowdfunding to boost prize money for Best Australian Poetry Film, Best Bush Poetry Film, and even Best Student Poetry Film. Every bit fuels filmmakers’ dreams and lets them share their visions with the world.
So, whether you write rhymes, love movies, or just adore Aussie tales, join us! Submit your film, donate to the cause, or simply come to Guyra in November and witness the magic. Let’s bring poetry to life, one frame, one verse, one epic story at a time!
For film submissions and crowdfunding details, visit:
Thundercloud Repairian 